The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders is revised every decade or so, and a revision is under way right now. Up until recently, there has been criticism that the proceedings were taking place in secret. This is not unusual, as I understand it, but it is significant for many people. Mental-health clinicians, for example, have to use the diagnostic categories in the DSM to label their clients, and if the categories and descriptions listed don’t coincide with their experiences or beliefs, this can be quite difficult. It is significant for mental-health clients, too, for complementary and even more personal reasons. What will happen to your diagnosis? In? Out? Changed? These decisions have a big impact on social issues, like stigma, and economic issues, like what insurance companies will pay for.
The DSM committee is proposing, for example, to subsume the diagnosis of Asperger’s Disorder into Autism Disorder. This seems to make a lot of sense, unless you or your child is benefiting from the existence of Asperger’s because of insurance company rules, state regulations, or other regulatory factors.
The content of the DSM is important to people for political reasons, too. For example, the third revision of the DSM eliminated homosexuality as a mental disorder. That was in 1973, for the DSM-III. (We’ve since had the DSM-III-R, DSM-IV, and DSM-IV-TR. They are currently working on the DSM-V.) It may be hard to believe that being gay was an official Mental Disorder, but it was. People were even lobotomized for it: Here, let me “help” you with that unnatural sexual attraction by forcing an icepick in over one of your eyes, through your skull, to twist it in your brain. The removal of homosexuality from the DSM was very controversial in its day, but no one credible is fighting for it to go back in.
That is to say, the DSM can reflect the changing mores of society, which in turn influences the way society sees mental health and illness. This process can effect the quality of a lot of our lives. And now the DSM committee has revealed the changes they are contemplating and is asking for feedback. This is from their website:
“Your input, whether you are a clinician, a researcher, an administrator, or a person/family member affected by a mental disorder, is important to us. We thank you for taking part in this historic process and look forward to receiving your feedback.”
You almost certainly fall into one of those categories. Take part in this opportunity! Of course, our input being “important” to them does not mean they will pay attention to it, but it can’t hurt to try. The worst that can happen is that you will be better informed about your mental-health system. Here are the categories that they are considering changes in. Click on them to read the proposed changes. To submit feedback, you have to register with them, but it only takes a minute:
February 23, 2010 at 9:27 pm
Are there way more disorders now than before? (Is the list in the DSM-V longer than ever?) I’m curious, because it seems like there are so many common disorders these days than I ever heard of. Maybe disorders are just given more attention now?
February 23, 2010 at 10:15 pm
Well, I’m not sure, but the DSM has never gotten smaller with a new edition, so probably. The first edition was maybe 100 pages. Now it’s about 1,000 pages. The reasons depend on who you ask, but one probable reason is that we’re making new distinctions as we study the ways people have a hard time. I’ve heard it seriously speculated, and I believe it, that if we could eliminate domestic violence and child abuse, we could reduced the DSM to a pamphlet.
February 24, 2010 at 9:10 am
I’ll go for that!
March 14, 2010 at 4:33 pm
Where can We find a lot more details on this theme?
March 14, 2010 at 4:42 pm
I recommend following the links I gave and reading what the DSM-V committee has written about it.
Nathen
May 3, 2010 at 3:44 pm
Let’s throw it out!