I just read in Brock & Barnard’s Procedures in Marriage and Family Therapy about Wolin and colleagues’ research into rituals in alcoholic families. Apparently, the negative effects of an alcoholic parent were predicted better by the amount that family rituals were disrupted by the alcoholism than by the presence of alcoholism itself. For example, if the family continued to eat dinner together every night, continued with their bedtime rituals, etc, children remained about as well off as those in non-alcoholic households. But if the family rituals were destroyed, the children were much worse off, including much more likely to become alcoholic or marry an alcoholic themselves.
I haven’t read any of the original research, so I don’t know for sure if it is that these rituals actually provide resiliency or if the presence or lack of rituals served as a proxy measure for how bad the alcoholism was. It could also be a combination of the two. It does look like the family therapy literature considers that rituals promote resiliency in general, providing structure and comforting predictability for kids, and resulting in better outcomes. (I doubt they are bad for the adults, either.) Something to think about, parents!
May 16, 2010 at 10:34 am
Yep. That’s what I love about Waldorf. It’s so much about ritual and rhythmn in a child’s life. I think it’s healing for parents too, if they didn’t have it as a child.
May 17, 2010 at 4:23 pm
If we ever have kids, we will have to invent some new rituals! Currently, we don’t have a set routine, set mealtimes, or even a room in which we always eat. Sometimes I think that if I were meant to have kids, I would have had them by now.
May 28, 2010 at 8:15 am
Sacrifice or Murder?…
I found your entry interesting thus I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)…