I posted this on my Advanced Family Theory discussion board a couple weeks ago. There were no replies:
According to Metaframeworks (p. 30) (which I’m loving, by the way), one of the ways which Bertalanffy distinguished organic from mechanical systems is that organic systems violate Newton’s 2nd law of thermodynamics. That is, we and the larger systems we are part of grow increasingly complex, even though Newton predicted only increasing disorder according to the rules of thermodynamics.
This “evidence of negentropy” is one of the major planks of the “intelligent design” argument for a creator being logically deducible by the presence of organic systems. Unfortunately for ID-ers and Bertalanffy, life does not violate Newton’s 2nd law because even though organisms and other phenotypes are highly and increasingly complex, our living and doing create disorder much more efficiently than nonliving systems. That is, it’s more accurate to say that Newton’s 2nd law drives the complexity of life than to say that life violates that law.
If you are as excited as I am by this idea, check out Dorion Sagan’s Into the Cool: Flow, Thermodynamics, and Life.
I warned you this note was nerdy.
November 22, 2010 at 11:40 am
Well said.
That seems to be a common argument by semi-well educated ID-ers. I think that you hit the nail on the head; as you get into O-chem, it become more and more clear that it is the randomness that drives the mechanics of life and NOT order at all.
November 22, 2010 at 5:15 pm
Like!
I did not know Carl Sagan’s son was an author. Checking the library for a copy of Into the Cool now.
November 22, 2010 at 8:25 pm
He’s also written books with his mom, Lynn Margulis, who’s a big name among complexity theorists.I believe she was the person who came up with the idea of endosymbiosis–that mitochondria and chloroplasts were once separate creatures from animals and plants. Oh, wait. I’m talking to a biologist. So Cory, what’s endosymbiosis?
November 23, 2010 at 9:54 am
I like your dream!!